![[Main Page]](http://www.thelemapedia.org/images/logo.gif){kind=logo}
The Book of the Law
(Difference between revisions)
Categories: Thelema | Sacred Texts | AL vel Legis | Holy Books of Thelema
|
Revision as of 22:52, 6 Apr 2005 Ash (Talk | contribs) see alsos and formatting |
Current revision Omega (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *"Love is the law, love under will" (AL I:57) | *"Love is the law, love under will" (AL I:57) | ||
| - | Interpretation of this book is considered a matter for the individual, and openly promoting personal ideas about its meaning is strongly discouraged. Although Crowley expressed the desire to see the Law of Thelema promulgated in all areas of society, success in this endevour is to be based on others willfully following the the good example of Thelemites rather than by evangelization or direct attempts to convert others. "Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not over much!" (AL III:42) | + | Interpretation of this book is considered a matter for the individual, and openly promoting personal ideas about its meaning is strongly discouraged. Although Crowley expressed the desire to see the Law of Thelema promulgated in all areas of society, success in this endeavor is to be based on others willfully following the the good example of Thelemites rather than by evangelization or direct attempts to convert others. "Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not over much!" (AL III:42) |
| ==The Writing of Liber Legis== | ==The Writing of Liber Legis== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ===The Summons=== | ===The Summons=== | ||
| - | According to Crowley, the story begins on March 16, 1904, when he tries to “shew the Sylphs” by means of a ritual to his wife, [[Rose Kelly|Rose]]. Although she could see nothing, she did seem to enter into a light trance and repeatedly said, "They're waiting for you!" Since Rose had no interest in [[magick]] or mysticism, he took little interest. However, on the 18th, after invoking [[Thoth]] (the god of knowledge), she mentions [[Horus]] by name as the one waiting for him. Crowley, still sceptical, asks her numerous questions about Horus, which she answers accurately—without having any prior study of the subject. The final proof was Rose’s identification of Horus in the [[Stele of Revealing]], then housed in the Boulak museum, with the exibit number [[666]]. | + | According to Crowley, the story begins on March 16, 1904, when he tries to “shew the Sylphs” by means of a ritual to his wife, [[Rose Kelly|Rose]]. Although she could see nothing, she did seem to enter into a light trance and repeatedly said, "They're waiting for you!" Since Rose had no interest in [[magick]] or mysticism, he took little interest. However, on the 18th, after invoking [[Thoth]] (the god of knowledge), she mentions [[Horus]] by name as the one waiting for him. Crowley, still skeptical, asks her numerous questions about Horus, which she answers accurately—without having any prior study of the subject. The final proof was Rose’s identification of Horus in the [[Stele of Revealing]], then housed in the Boulak museum, with the exhibit number [[666]]. |
| On March 20, Crowley invokes Horus, “with great success.” Between March 23 and April 8, Crowley has the hieroglyphs on the Stele translated. Also, Rose reveals that her “informant” was not Horus himself, but his messenger, [[Aiwass]]. Finally, on April 7, Rose gives Crowley his instructions—for three days he is to enter the “temple” and write down what he heard between noon and 1:00pm. | On March 20, Crowley invokes Horus, “with great success.” Between March 23 and April 8, Crowley has the hieroglyphs on the Stele translated. Also, Rose reveals that her “informant” was not Horus himself, but his messenger, [[Aiwass]]. Finally, on April 7, Rose gives Crowley his instructions—for three days he is to enter the “temple” and write down what he heard between noon and 1:00pm. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| Although he did not look around the room, Crowley had the impression that Aiwass was a body of “fine matter” like a “veil of gauze.” He further describes Aiwass as a “tall, dark man in his thirties, well-knit, active and strong, with the face of a savage king, and eyes veiled lest their gaze should destroy what they saw” (Crowley, 1997). | Although he did not look around the room, Crowley had the impression that Aiwass was a body of “fine matter” like a “veil of gauze.” He further describes Aiwass as a “tall, dark man in his thirties, well-knit, active and strong, with the face of a savage king, and eyes veiled lest their gaze should destroy what they saw” (Crowley, 1997). | ||
| - | Crowley also makes it very clear that it was not “automatic writing,” but that the experience was exactly like an actual voice speaking to him. This is evidenced by several errors that the scribe actually had to enquire about. He does admit to the possibility that Aiwass was a manifestation of his own subconscious. But even were this so, he claimed that the message imparted by Aiwass was so beyond human experience or knowledge that it necessitated a praeternatural intelligence that only a god could possess. | + | Crowley also makes it very clear that it was not “automatic writing,” but that the experience was exactly like an actual voice speaking to him. This is evidenced by several errors that the scribe actually had to inquire about. He does admit to the possibility that Aiwass was a manifestation of his own subconscious. But even were this so, he claimed that the message imparted by Aiwass was so beyond human experience or knowledge that it necessitated a praeternatural intelligence that only a god could possess. |
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Reception of Liber Legis]] | ||
| *[[Thelema]] | *[[Thelema]] | ||
| *[[Aleister Crowley]] | *[[Aleister Crowley]] | ||
| Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
| *[[Holy Books of Thelema]] | *[[Holy Books of Thelema]] | ||
| *[[Aiwass]] | *[[Aiwass]] | ||
| + | *[[Index to Topics in Liber Legis]] | ||
| ==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
| *[http://www.hermetic.com/220/crowley-comment.html The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL] by Aleister Crowley | *[http://www.hermetic.com/220/crowley-comment.html The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL] by Aleister Crowley | ||
| - | *[http://www.geocities.com/nu_isis/dcomment.pdf The Comment Called D -The Djeridensis Working] (PDF format) by Aleister Crowley | + | *[http://www.ashami.com/eidolons/The_Djeridensis_Working The Djeridensis Working (The Comment Called D)], Crowley's 1923 Commentary on Liber Legis. |
| [[Category:Thelema]] | [[Category:Thelema]] | ||
Current revision
 |
This article is incomplete. You can help Thelemapedia by adding to it (http://thelemapedia.org/index.php?title=The_Book_of_the_Law&action=edit). |
The full title of this book is
Liber AL vel Legis
sub figura CCXX
The Book of the Law
as delivered by XCIII=418 to DCLXVI
The religion known as Thelema was established with the writing of The Book of the Law. It was written (or received) by Aleister Crowley in Cairo, Egypt in the year 1904. It contains three chapters, each of which was written down in one hour, beginning at noon, on April 8th, 9th, and 10th. Crowley claims that the author was an entity named Aiwass, whom he later identified as his own Holy Guardian Angel. The teachings within this small book are clearly expressed in the Law of Thelema, expressed by these two phrases:
- "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law" (AL I:40) and
- "Love is the law, love under will" (AL I:57)
Interpretation of this book is considered a matter for the individual, and openly promoting personal ideas about its meaning is strongly discouraged. Although Crowley expressed the desire to see the Law of Thelema promulgated in all areas of society, success in this endeavor is to be based on others willfully following the the good example of Thelemites rather than by evangelization or direct attempts to convert others. "Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not over much!" (AL III:42)
| Table of contents |
The Writing of Liber Legis
The Summons
According to Crowley, the story begins on March 16, 1904, when he tries to “shew the Sylphs” by means of a ritual to his wife, Rose. Although she could see nothing, she did seem to enter into a light trance and repeatedly said, "They're waiting for you!" Since Rose had no interest in magick or mysticism, he took little interest. However, on the 18th, after invoking Thoth (the god of knowledge), she mentions Horus by name as the one waiting for him. Crowley, still skeptical, asks her numerous questions about Horus, which she answers accurately—without having any prior study of the subject. The final proof was Rose’s identification of Horus in the Stele of Revealing, then housed in the Boulak museum, with the exhibit number 666.
On March 20, Crowley invokes Horus, “with great success.” Between March 23 and April 8, Crowley has the hieroglyphs on the Stele translated. Also, Rose reveals that her “informant” was not Horus himself, but his messenger, Aiwass. Finally, on April 7, Rose gives Crowley his instructions—for three days he is to enter the “temple” and write down what he heard between noon and 1:00pm.
The Writing
Crowley wrote the Book of the Law on April 8, 9, and 10, between the hours of noon and 1:00pm. He describes the “Voice of Aiwass” as coming from over his left shoulder, as if the speaker were standing in the corner of the room. The voice was said to be passionate, of deep timbre, and musical, without any recognizable accent.
Although he did not look around the room, Crowley had the impression that Aiwass was a body of “fine matter” like a “veil of gauze.” He further describes Aiwass as a “tall, dark man in his thirties, well-knit, active and strong, with the face of a savage king, and eyes veiled lest their gaze should destroy what they saw” (Crowley, 1997).
Crowley also makes it very clear that it was not “automatic writing,” but that the experience was exactly like an actual voice speaking to him. This is evidenced by several errors that the scribe actually had to inquire about. He does admit to the possibility that Aiwass was a manifestation of his own subconscious. But even were this so, he claimed that the message imparted by Aiwass was so beyond human experience or knowledge that it necessitated a praeternatural intelligence that only a god could possess.
See also
- Reception of Liber Legis
- Thelema
- Aleister Crowley
- True Will
- Holy Books of Thelema
- Aiwass
- Index to Topics in Liber Legis
External Links
- Text version of The Book of the Law (http://oto-usa.org/l220.html)
- Manuscript version of The Book of the Law (http://oto-usa.org/l31.html)
Comments on The Book of the Law
- The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL (http://www.hermetic.com/220/crowley-comment.html) by Aleister Crowley
- The Djeridensis Working (The Comment Called D) (http://www.ashami.com/eidolons/The_Djeridensis_Working), Crowley's 1923 Commentary on Liber Legis.