Talk:Temple Furniture
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 15:52, 27 Sep 2004 Paradoxosalpha (Talk | contribs) |
Current revision Ash (Talk | contribs) more comments |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I wonder about the title of this article. Wouldn't it be better to call it "Temple Components," so that the leading term is the defintive "Temple" rather than the unenlightening "Parts"? --[[User:Paradoxosalpha|Paradoxosalpha]] 11:52, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT) | I wonder about the title of this article. Wouldn't it be better to call it "Temple Components," so that the leading term is the defintive "Temple" rather than the unenlightening "Parts"? --[[User:Paradoxosalpha|Paradoxosalpha]] 11:52, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :This was actually my first idea and I should have went with it. So, obviously I have moved the article. [[User:Ash|Ash]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I'd even prefer an article "Temple" with this as a subhead. --[[user:Craig Berry|isomeme]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::This might end up being the best solution. Of course, you could have both. The idea here was to build a category tree. If this particular page doesn't work, we can collapse it into the general "Temple" article (as soon as someone writes it, of course). [[User:Ash|Ash]] |
Current revision
I wonder about the title of this article. Wouldn't it be better to call it "Temple Components," so that the leading term is the defintive "Temple" rather than the unenlightening "Parts"? --Paradoxosalpha 11:52, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT)
- This was actually my first idea and I should have went with it. So, obviously I have moved the article. Ash
- I'd even prefer an article "Temple" with this as a subhead. --isomeme
- This might end up being the best solution. Of course, you could have both. The idea here was to build a category tree. If this particular page doesn't work, we can collapse it into the general "Temple" article (as soon as someone writes it, of course). Ash