![[Main Page]](http://www.thelemapedia.org/images/logo.gif){kind=logo}
Talk:The Great God Pan (book)
(Difference between revisions)
|
Revision as of 21:12, 10 Jul 2005 ThomasStevens (Talk | contribs) |
Current revision Fr. Zabed (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| 93 Fr. Zabed, | 93 Fr. Zabed, | ||
| - | + | # It's part of the A:.A:. reading list. | |
| - | 1. It's part of the A:.A:. reading list. | + | # It presents a great description of Pan. |
| - | 2. It presents a great description of Pan. | + | # I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much. I was just looking for some fiction to read. I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia. |
| - | 3. I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much. I was just looking for some fiction to read. I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia. | + | |
| Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance. If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance." | Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance. If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance." | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
| 93,93/93 | 93,93/93 | ||
| [[User:ThomasStevens|Thomas Stevens]] 16:12, 10 Jul 2005 (CDT) | [[User:ThomasStevens|Thomas Stevens]] 16:12, 10 Jul 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 93. | ||
| + | Pardon my ignorance on the subject :) | ||
| + | 93 93/93. | ||
| + | [[User:Fr. Zabed|Fr. Zabed]] 11 july 2005 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| 93. | 93. | ||
Current revision
93 Fr. Zabed,
- It's part of the A:.A:. reading list.
- It presents a great description of Pan.
- I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much. I was just looking for some fiction to read. I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia.
Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance. If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance."
93,93/93 Thomas Stevens 16:12, 10 Jul 2005 (CDT)
93.
Pardon my ignorance on the subject :)
93 93/93.
Fr. Zabed 11 july 2005
93. I dont want to be rude or anything like that, i can see you like this book. But how is this relevant to Thelema?:) 93 93/93 Fr. Zabed