Talk:Knights Templar

(Difference between revisions)

Current revision

The Real Heresy of the Temple.

Right, let me set the scene its around 2000 years ago, a radical sect within the children of Israel is at work. We have a group of zealots called the sicari, and a prophet of Eloha, Jeheshuah, speaking and teaching the people. A plan is hatched by the corrupt prisethood intent on keeping their power. So how can the prophet be saved, a man is needed who has the air of the prophet, maybe a family member, a soldier of the christ. The next part is the most dangerous for they must change places, the prophet goes to the temple guards and leads them back to the soldier, the sicari, the Judas. His love for him is so great that a tear runs down his face, and he kisses his brother in thanks on his cheek. The guards lead off the sicari, and you know the rest...he is hung from a tree/cross, but a centurion pierces his side with the spear as his heart still beats, and he is taken down. Later Jehesuah is asked 'where have you been' to which he replies 'I have been as Jonah in the belly of the whale'. Later a man known as Judas changes his name to Thomas, meaning brother, not risen as a sun...risen as a star behind a cross.

—Nehustan

93 Nehustan, Dont forget to sign your posts on the talk pages with ~~~~ It keeps the confusion down. Thanks.

One more question, what's the reason for this post? If you wish to edit the article go ahead, and don't forget to provide sources for your entry.<p>

93 93/93 Frater C.U.G. 22:25, 12 Jul 2005 (CDT)

Peace Tolerance Greetings to the order. Hi there Frater CUG, the post was really to spark talk around the issue. It is well known that the heresy of the temple concerned in part a renunciation of the crucifixion and the risen christ. This of course is highly likely to have arisen from close contact between the templar and the deen of Islam during the crusades. The assumption that it may have been the sicari that was crucified comes from biblical reading. As I have just moved I do not possess a bible at the moment but when acquired I shall write a whole article on the matter for the wiki rather than just posting in the talk section.

—Nehustan

Well sparking talk is not what Thelemapedia is all about, it's an encyclopedia not a forum.

93 93/93 Frater C.U.G. 19:30, 13 Jul 2005 (CDT)

93 (which would make it 2012)

Sure got you, I misunderstood what the talk sections were for. I will endeavour to get a bible and fully resource an article on this particular apsect of the templar fully referenced. Forgive me for being a slow starter.

—Nehustan

Retrieved from "http://thelemapedia.org/index.php/Talk:Knights_Templar"

 :93 93/93 [[User:Frater C.U.G.|Frater C.U.G.]] 19:30, 13 Jul 2005 (CDT)
 ----
+(which would make it 2012)
+Sure got you,  I misunderstood what the talk sections were for. I will endeavour to get a bible and fully resource an article on this particular apsect of the templar fully referenced. Forgive me for being a slow starter.
+—[[User:Nehustan|Nehustan]]