Had
(Difference between revisions)
Categories: Thelema | Thelemic terms
Revision as of 23:40, 27 Oct 2004 Aleph (Talk | contribs) |
Revision as of 23:41, 27 Oct 2004 Aleph (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
+ | *Crowley, Aleister. [http://www.hermetic.com/220/crowley-comment.html The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL]. Retrieved Oct. 27, 2004. | ||
[[Category:Thelema]] | [[Category:Thelema]] | ||
[[Category:Thelemic terms]] | [[Category:Thelemic terms]] |
Revision as of 23:41, 27 Oct 2004
Had! the manifestation of Nuit! (AL I,1)
The unveiling of the company of Heaven. (AL I,2)
Had is, quite simply, the word for 'manifestation' in Thelema. It would perhaps be more accurate to consider Had to be a verb, to manifest, and even then an active verb, manifesting would be more accurate still. There is contained in it an element, however, of time and duration, but of a process rather than a thing.
When the '-it' ending is added, this notion of becoming is reified into the winged disk of the Sun identified on the Stélé of Revealing as "Hadit, the great god, the lord of the sky."
Crowley on Had
- "Nu conceals Had because He is Everywhere in the Infinite, and She manifests Him for the same reason. See verse 3. Every Individual manifests the Whole; and the Whole conceals every Individual. The Soul interprets the Universe; and the Universe veils the Soul. Nature understands Herself by becoming self-conscious in Her units; and the Consciousness loses its sense of separateness by dissolution in Her."
References
- Crowley, Aleister. The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL (http://www.hermetic.com/220/crowley-comment.html). Retrieved Oct. 27, 2004.