![[Main Page]](http://www.thelemapedia.org/images/logo.gif){kind=logo}
Talk:Islamic Godforms
(Difference between revisions)
|
Revision as of 04:08, 22 Sep 2004 Ash (Talk | contribs) |
Revision as of 05:23, 22 Sep 2004 Fr. Zabed (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The only change I really made was to remove a self-reference. We want to avoid the first person and stick with encyclopedic language (i.e. a neutral POV). —[[User:Ash|Ash]] | The only change I really made was to remove a self-reference. We want to avoid the first person and stick with encyclopedic language (i.e. a neutral POV). —[[User:Ash|Ash]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | - | ||
| + | (both LA AL and AL LA is both called no god in the text) | ||
| + | I'm aware that Al Ahad is one of the beautiful names with the meaning "he is one" or "one god", but im not sure about Alla(h) means "no god", there is no doubt that Al means god and Lah means nothing, but there is a difference in AL LA and LA AL, i interpret AL LA as "one god, nothing else" and LA AL as "no god", anyway, thats my opinion, anyone have any thoughts on this? Would it not be strange from an exoteric viewpoint to do zikr to "no god" ? | ||
Revision as of 05:23, 22 Sep 2004
The only change I really made was to remove a self-reference. We want to avoid the first person and stick with encyclopedic language (i.e. a neutral POV). —Ash
-
(both LA AL and AL LA is both called no god in the text)
I'm aware that Al Ahad is one of the beautiful names with the meaning "he is one" or "one god", but im not sure about Alla(h) means "no god", there is no doubt that Al means god and Lah means nothing, but there is a difference in AL LA and LA AL, i interpret AL LA as "one god, nothing else" and LA AL as "no god", anyway, thats my opinion, anyone have any thoughts on this? Would it not be strange from an exoteric viewpoint to do zikr to "no god" ?