![[Main Page]](http://www.thelemapedia.org/images/logo.gif){kind=logo}
Thelemapedia:Really Simple Tutorial (content)
(Difference between revisions)
|
Revision as of 22:24, 1 Jul 2005 Ash (Talk | contribs) |
Revision as of 23:06, 1 Jul 2005 Ash (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| Don't wait to contribute until you've written an entire article. It is completely acceptable, and even expected, that editors will add materials in a piecemeal fashion. If there is only one thing you know about a topic, then write about that one thing. | Don't wait to contribute until you've written an entire article. It is completely acceptable, and even expected, that editors will add materials in a piecemeal fashion. If there is only one thing you know about a topic, then write about that one thing. | ||
| - | [[Really Simple Tutorial (tidbits)]] | + | [[Thelemapedia:Really Simple Tutorial (tidbits)]] |
Revision as of 23:06, 1 Jul 2005
Content is where things get a little tricky and difficult to explain in very simple terms. However, this is the "Really Simple Tutorial", so let's give it a shot...
| Table of contents |
Writing style
Thelemapedia is an encyclopedia—it is not a dictionary, soapbox, journal, discussion forum, site mirror, or link repository (see more on what Thelemapedia is not).
All articles should embody the Primary Editorial Principles:
- Articles should be sympathetic with the principles, culture, practices, and beliefs of Thelema whenever possible.
- Articles should promote clarity, accuracy, and the will to inform without distortion or fabrication.
- Articles should reflect knowledge that is generally accepted in the Thelemic community, drawing from expert sources or common knowledge.
So, what does all that mean?
- Articles should have a pro-Thelema frame whenever possible.
- Articles should be a summary of existing knowledge, not personal opinion or subjective experience.
- Information should come from books and journals.
- Aleister Crowley is considered to be the primary Thelemic source.
- Language should be neutral. Avoid speaking from the first person (e.g. "In my opinion..." or "I believe..."). Do not sign your articles.
- Writing should not be dramatic, mysterious, or prose-like. Just the facts, Jack, just the facts.
- Avoid or link to technical jargon. Do not assume knowledge in the reader.
- Aim to educate visitors who are seeking clear and accurate knowledge.
It would be a good idea to go over Thelemapedia's Editorial Policy when you have a chance.
Basic article structure
Although every topic is different, and some articles will have unique information structures, most will follow this general pattern:
- Brief intro—a lead section which is brief but sufficient to summarize the entire topic
- Overview—focusing more on the core of the subject, rather than the complete range
- Detailed sections—covering the major aspects of the topic (be sure to use headers!)
- See also—List of links to other relevant Thelemapedia articles
- External links—to relevant sites of interest
- References—citing sources used
- Categories—add any that fit
Citing sources
It is important that you cite your sources if you draw from a book, journal, or website. If you write something like "Crowley believed that the sky was yellow", you should tell us where he said that. Also, if you write something that is a statement or belief of a group or person, be sure you attribute that statement or belief to them. This is not necessary for beliefs that are commonly held by Thelemites or considered very common knowledge. It's your call, but be thoughtful about it.
There are two ways to cite sources in the body on an article:
- After a quote or paraphrase. Ex. Diana was also worshipped "as a goddess of nature" (Frazer, 1993, p.141).
- Before a quote or paraphrase. Ex. Frazer (1993, p.141) writes that Diana was also worshipped "as a goddess of nature."
The exception to this format is when citing Aleister Crowley. On Thelemapedia, the standard is to list the name of the book or text. Examples:
- "The Circle announces the Nature of the Great Work" (Magick, ch.2).
- Crowley writes in Magick (ch.2), "The Circle announces the Nature of the Great Work."
- "The Circle announces the Nature of the Great Work" (Liber IV).
- "Every man and every woman is a star." (AL I:3)
Put under the "References" header, again in a bulleted list, any books, articles, web pages, etcetera that you used in constructing the article and/or recommend as sources of further information to readers.
- Frazer, James. (1993). The Golden Bough. Hertfordshire, U.K. : Wordsworth Reference
- Crowley, Aleister. (1997). Magick: Book 4. 2nd ed. York Beach, Me. : S. Weiser.
- ____. (1979). The Confessions of Aleister Crowley. London;Boston : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Thriambos, Dionysos. (2002). "Conditions for Eucharistic Magick (http://www.scarletwoman.org/scarletletter/v7n2/v7n2_conditions.html)." The Scarlet Letter. Vol. VII, No. 2.
If a page is taken from another GNU-licensed site, like Wikipedia, it should be referenced as such:
- Adapted from: Wikipedia. (2005). Thelemapedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelemapedia). Retrieved on July 1, 2005.
Citing sources provide references that help the reader to check the veracity of the article and to find more information. If you consult an external source while writing an article, citing it is basic intellectual honesty. More than that, you should actively search for authoritative references to cite. If you are writing from your own knowledge, then you should know enough to identify good references that the reader can consult on the subject. The main point is to help the reader—cite whatever you think will be most helpful. This applies when writing about opinions, as well—beware the temptation to write weasel phrases like, "Some people say..." Who said it, and where and when?
You don't have to write a complete article
Don't wait to contribute until you've written an entire article. It is completely acceptable, and even expected, that editors will add materials in a piecemeal fashion. If there is only one thing you know about a topic, then write about that one thing.