Talk:Personalities in Thelema
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 09:59, 28 Sep 2004 Paradoxosalpha (Talk | contribs) |
Revision as of 10:18, 28 Sep 2004 Paradoxosalpha (Talk | contribs) Overlap |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I second that. There can be a separate listing of the historical "Scarlet Women" in the [[Scarlet Woman]] article! --[[User:Paradoxosalpha|Paradoxosalpha]] 05:59, 28 Sep 2004 (EDT) | :I second that. There can be a separate listing of the historical "Scarlet Women" in the [[Scarlet Woman]] article! --[[User:Paradoxosalpha|Paradoxosalpha]] 05:59, 28 Sep 2004 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Overlap == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Part of the Scarlet Woman problem that Craig notes is the issue of overlap, which is even more true of notable OTO and A.'.A.'. initiates. There's Jane Wolfe, Wilfred Smith, Jack Parsons, C.S. Jones--all in both orders, and those just off the top of my head. |
Revision as of 10:18, 28 Sep 2004
Do we really want to put the women into the "Scarlet women" category as distinct from past OTO and AA members? I would be far more comfortable with the latter option.
- I second that. There can be a separate listing of the historical "Scarlet Women" in the Scarlet Woman article! --Paradoxosalpha 05:59, 28 Sep 2004 (EDT)
Overlap
Part of the Scarlet Woman problem that Craig notes is the issue of overlap, which is even more true of notable OTO and A.'.A.'. initiates. There's Jane Wolfe, Wilfred Smith, Jack Parsons, C.S. Jones--all in both orders, and those just off the top of my head.