![[Main Page]](http://www.thelemapedia.org/images/logo.gif){kind=logo}
User talk:Fr. Zabed
(Difference between revisions)
|
Revision as of 16:42, 6 Jul 2005 Ash (Talk | contribs) |
Revision as of 13:04, 7 Jul 2005 Fr. Zabed (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| You've been awarded a Star of Thelemapedia! See your user page... [[User:Ash|Fr. Ash]] 11:42, 6 Jul 2005 (CDT) | You've been awarded a Star of Thelemapedia! See your user page... [[User:Ash|Fr. Ash]] 11:42, 6 Jul 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 93! | ||
| + | Thanks :) | ||
| + | 93 93/93. | ||
| + | Z. | ||
| 93. Thanks for contributing so much. It's a great help. I have one suggestion...when we take articles from Wikipedia, we should try to take out a lot of the needless internal links. I know it's a pain in the ass...I do it, too (in MS Word, actually). But since this isn't an all-purpose encyclopedia, we don't need links to every possible topic. It will also avoid a ton of red links on a page, which looks bad. Eventually, we want nothing but blue! Anyway, thanks again! --[[User:Ash|Ash]] 23:45, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT) | 93. Thanks for contributing so much. It's a great help. I have one suggestion...when we take articles from Wikipedia, we should try to take out a lot of the needless internal links. I know it's a pain in the ass...I do it, too (in MS Word, actually). But since this isn't an all-purpose encyclopedia, we don't need links to every possible topic. It will also avoid a ton of red links on a page, which looks bad. Eventually, we want nothing but blue! Anyway, thanks again! --[[User:Ash|Ash]] 23:45, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:04, 7 Jul 2005
You've been awarded a Star of Thelemapedia! See your user page... Fr. Ash 11:42, 6 Jul 2005 (CDT)
93! Thanks :) 93 93/93. Z.
93. Thanks for contributing so much. It's a great help. I have one suggestion...when we take articles from Wikipedia, we should try to take out a lot of the needless internal links. I know it's a pain in the ass...I do it, too (in MS Word, actually). But since this isn't an all-purpose encyclopedia, we don't need links to every possible topic. It will also avoid a ton of red links on a page, which looks bad. Eventually, we want nothing but blue! Anyway, thanks again! --Ash 23:45, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)
-
93.
Good point bro ;)
You are doing a good job yourself :)
93 93/93.
Z.
-- Good points, although I don't think extra red links are a bad thing. The more information the better, it gives many avenues of adding content and the red links are an invitation for someone to eventually write some content. However, I'll defer to your lead since you are running the thing!--phos 00:40, 30 Sep 2004 (EDT)