[Main Page] Main Page | Recent changes | Edit this page | Page history

Printable version | #REDIRECT [[Thelemapedia:Disclaimers]] | Current revision

Not logged in
Log in | Help
 

Talk:Non-religious Thelemites and their views

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 01:50, 29 Oct 2005
Ash (Talk | contribs)
Revision as of 07:35, 6 Nov 2005
Frater C.U.G. (Talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:
: This article would be tough to rewite, but I myself wouldn't object. It might be possible to discover what came from FET and simply delete/rewrite that, if such is your intent. [[User:Ash|Fr. Ash]] 20:47, 28 Oct 2005 (CDT) : This article would be tough to rewite, but I myself wouldn't object. It might be possible to discover what came from FET and simply delete/rewrite that, if such is your intent. [[User:Ash|Fr. Ash]] 20:47, 28 Oct 2005 (CDT)
 +
 +Doesn't this article predate the FET? (In fact it was the cause of the founding of the FET if I'm not mistaken). In that case the article does not need any references to the other site as it was not the source of the material. If I'm mistaken about the timeline please correct me.
 +
 + Now original author of this (who is running the other site) retains copyright for this article and can do with it as he wishes (Including not linking back here in this case) but he can not revoke our right to use/edit as it stands.
 +
 + [[User:Frater C.U.G.|Frater C.U.G.]] 01:35, 6 Nov 2005 (CST)
---- ----
''This talk page prior to Oct 27 2005 has been [[Talk:Non-religious Thelemites and their views/archive|archived here]].'' ''This talk page prior to Oct 27 2005 has been [[Talk:Non-religious Thelemites and their views/archive|archived here]].''

Revision as of 07:35, 6 Nov 2005

This article should be blanked and written from scratch. The article has been copied over from FET, which site contains degree secrets of OTO. As a project of OTO, it is inappropriate for Thelemapedia to link to FET; and any content originating from that site must be cited with a link back; therefore, we should not copy or derive articles from FET. Thiebes 05:01, 28 Oct 2005 (CDT)

Isn't that censorship? --Ahavah veemet
No, it is a request for total rewrite. Thiebes
This article would be tough to rewite, but I myself wouldn't object. It might be possible to discover what came from FET and simply delete/rewrite that, if such is your intent. Fr. Ash 20:47, 28 Oct 2005 (CDT)

Doesn't this article predate the FET? (In fact it was the cause of the founding of the FET if I'm not mistaken). In that case the article does not need any references to the other site as it was not the source of the material. If I'm mistaken about the timeline please correct me.

 Now original author of this (who is running the other site) retains copyright for this article and can do with it as he wishes (Including not linking back here in this case) but he can not revoke our right to use/edit as it stands.
 Frater C.U.G. 01:35, 6 Nov 2005 (CST)

This talk page prior to Oct 27 2005 has been archived here.