Thiebes at 11:14, 3 March 2005

2005-03-03T11:14:53Z

New page

{{thelema}}
The category life-death-rebirth deity also known as a "dying-and-rising" or '''dying and resurrecting god''' is a convenient means of classifying the many divinities in world [[mythology]] who are born, suffer death or an eclipse or other death-like experience, pass a phase in the [[underworld]] among the dead, and are subsequently reborn, in either a literal or symbolic sense. Such deities might include [[Osiris]], [[Adonis]], [[Jesus]], and [[Mithras]]. Females deities who passed into the kingdom of death and returned include [[Inanna]] and [[Persephone]], the central figure of the [[Eleusinian Mysteries]].

Historically, this category has been most strongly associated with two different approaches to the study of religion. The first, which might be labelled the "naturalist" approach, seeks to explain such myths in terms of parallels with natural processes. The second, which might be labelled the "internal" approach, seeks to explain such myths in terms of individual spiritual transformation.

==The naturalist approach==
Of the two major life-death-and-resurrection approaches to [[hermeneutics]], the naturalistic explication has more support in ancient sources. These rituals were closely linked to the cycle of seasons, as when Athenian women planted "gardens of Adonis" in pots and then, when the young green growth withered in the heat of the summer, wept for the dead young god. Already in Antiquity, the rationalizing approach of [[Aristotle]] could be elaborated to a rigidly naturalistic interpretation of myth origins as explanations of natural seasonal phenomena. Such a reductionist interpretation was apparently epitomized by Euhemerus (late 4th century [[BCE]]), giving the term "euhemerist". Rational [[Stoicism|Stoic]] Romans like Cicero and Seneca, who saw the official and civil nature of ritual as paramount, were prepared to explain the myths and festivals of [[Attis]], Adonis and Persephone in terms of natural phenomena. The abduction and return of Persephone, Cicero argued, was symbolic of the planting and growth of crops.

In the late eighteenth century, the naturalist interpretation took on renewed vigor, as freethinkers like [[Richard Payne Knight]] sought to explain all religious phenomena in terms of solar activity. Thus the tribulations of Jesus and [[Osiris]] were both taken to represent the course of the sun through the day, night, and dawn (Godwin, 1994 [[EV]]).

The naturalist hypothesis reached a further apogee in the works of [[James Frazer]] and Jane Ellen Harrison, and their fellow Cambridge Ritualists. In their seminal works ''The Golden Bough'' and ''Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion'', Frazer and Harrison argued that all myths are only echoes of rituals, and that all rituals have as their primordial purpose the manipulation of natural phenomena by means of [[sympathetic magic]]. The rape and return of Persephone, the rending and repair of Osiris, the travails and triumph of [[Baldur]] would therefore all be rooted in primitive rites to renew the fertility of withered land and crops.

==The internal approach==
By the Victorian era, the [[solar-phallic]] ideas of Payne Knight along with the less risqué work of scholars like [[Max Müller]] had taken strange turns as they made their way into popular discourse. Groups like the [[Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn]] were using scholarly parallels between Christ, Osiris and other putative solar dying-and-rising gods to build up elaborate systems of mysticism and theosophy.

By the twentieth century, this spiritualized turn to the universal-dying-god hypothesis had made its way into the sunlit uplands of academic discourse. From his studies of alchemy and other spiritual systems, the Swiss psychologist [[Carl Jung]] argued that [[archetype|archetypal]] processes such as death and resurrection were part of the transpersonal symbolism of the [[Collective Unconscious]], and could be utilized in the task of psychological integration. Jung's line of argumentation has been followed, with modifications, by scholars like Karl Kerenyi and [[Joseph Campbell]].

==Criticisms of the category==
The chief criticism that has been brought against the universal ''life-death-resurrection deity'' category is that it is [[reductionism|reductionist]]: in seeking to fit disparate myths into a single box, critics would contend, the hypothesis obscures distinctions that really matter. Furthermore, since death and resurrection are more central to Christianity than most other faiths, it risks making Christianity the standard by which all religion is judged. For extended arguments in this vein, see e.g. Burkert, 1987 and Detienne, 1994 EV.

Detienne, for example, has studied the ritual growing and withering of herb gardens at the Athenian [[Adonis|Adonia]] festival. He argues that rather than being a stand-in for crops in general, these herbs (and the herb-god [[Adonis]]) were part of a complex of associations in the Greek mind that centered around spices. These associations included seduction, trickery, gourmandaise, and the anxieties of childbirth. From this point of view, Adonis's death is only one datum among the many that must be used to analyze the festival, the myth and the god. On the other hand a god like [[Osiris]], whose functions relate to crops and the dead rather than spices and love, would call for a very different interpretation, despite the common theme of having died. Such, then, are the objections to the dying-and-rising-god hermeneutic.

==Christianity and the Life-Death-Rebirth Category==
The putative existence of a universal dying-and-rising god motif, and the particular existence of [[mystery religion]]s concerned with dying and rising gods around the Mediterranean Sea (e.g. [[Osiris]], [[Dionysus]], [[Attis]]), has led some observers to speculate that [[Jesus Christ]], rather than being a historical person, was in fact a syncretizing development of this [[archetype]].

Detractors, on the other hand, point out that many characteristics do not apply to Christ. For example, although Dionysus shared some interesting characteristics with Christ, he was on the other hand a hedonistic and bacchanalian god.

==Proposed life-death-rebirth deities==

*[[Aboriginal mythology]]
**[[Julunggul]]
**[[Wawalag]]
*[[Akkadian mythology]]
**[[Tammuz]]
**[[Ishtar]]
*[[Aztec mythology]]
**[[Xipe Totec]]
*[[Celtic mythology]]
**[[Cernunnos]]
*[[Christianity|Christian mythology]]
**[[Jesus|Jesus Christ]]
*[[Dacian mythology]]
**[[Zalmoxis]]
*[[Egyptian mythology]]
**[[Isis]]
**[[Osiris]]
*[[Etruscan mythology]]
**[[Atunis]]
*[[Greek mythology]]
**[[Adonis]]
**[[Cronus]]
**[[Cybele]]
**[[Dionysus]]
**[[Orpheus]]
**[[Persephone]]
*[[Hindu mythology]]
**[[Vishnu]]
**[[Siva]]
*[[Khoikhoi mythology]]
**[[Heitsi]]
*[[Norse mythology]]
**[[Baldur]]
**[[Gullveig]]
*[[Persian mythology]]
**[[Mithras]]
*[[Phrygian mythology]]
**[[Attis]]
*[[Roman mythology]]
**[[Aeneas]]
**[[Bacchus]]
**[[Proserpina]]
*[[Sumerian mythology]]
**[[Tammuz|Damuzi]]
**[[Inanna]]

==References==
* Burkert, Walter (1987). ''Ancient mystery cults''. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674033868
* Detienne, Marcel (1994). ''The gardens of Adonis: Spices in Greek mythology''. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0391006118
* [[James Frazer|Frazer, James George]] (1996). ''[[The Golden Bough]]''. New York: Touchstone Books. ISBN 0684826305
* Godwin, Joscelyn (1994). ''The theosophical enlightenment''. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0791421511
*Wikipedia (2005). ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life-death-rebirth_deity Life-death-rebirth deity].'' Retrieved March 3, 2005

==External link==
* [http://etor.h1.ru/torpaper.html "Cybele, Attis, and the Mysteriies of the 'Suffering Gods': A transpersonalistic interpretation" by Evgueni A. Torchinov, from ''The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies'' (1988, Vol 17, No. 2, pp 149–59)] (PDF.)

Dying and resurrecting god - Revision history

Thiebes at 11:14, 3 March 2005