Thelemapedia talk:Editorial Policy: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:38, 18 November 2005

I see you removed, However, we strongly encourage non-O.T.O. contributors. We still should mention that you don't have to be in the O.T.O. to be an editor, after all I'm not (but planing on it). Frater C.U.G. 23:53, 17 Nov 2005 (CST)

Agreed. I just thought the bold strong encouragement was over the top. Feel free to put something like you suggeest in. Thiebes 04:38, 18 Nov 2005 (CST)

Revision as of 05:53, 18 November 2005 view source Frater C.U.G. (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 511 edits non-O.T.O. contributors		Latest revision as of 10:38, 18 November 2005 view source Thiebes (talk \| contribs) Administrators 784 edits m sig
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I see you removed, '''However, we strongly encourage non-O.T.O. contributors.''' We still should mention that you don't have to be in the O.T.O. to be an editor, after all I'm not (but planing on it). [[User:Frater C.U.G.\|Frater C.U.G.]] 23:53, 17 Nov 2005 (CST)		I see you removed, '''However, we strongly encourage non-O.T.O. contributors.''' We still should mention that you don't have to be in the O.T.O. to be an editor, after all I'm not (but planing on it). [[User:Frater C.U.G.\|Frater C.U.G.]] 23:53, 17 Nov 2005 (CST)

			:Agreed. I just thought the bold '''strong''' encouragement was over the top. Feel free to put something like you suggeest in. [[User:Thiebes\|Thiebes]] 04:38, 18 Nov 2005 (CST)