Talk:Temple Furniture: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:55, 28 September 2004

I wonder about the title of this article. Wouldn't it be better to call it "Temple Components," so that the leading term is the defintive "Temple" rather than the unenlightening "Parts"? --Paradoxosalpha 11:52, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT)

I'd even prefer an article "Temple" with this as a subhead. --isomeme

Revision as of 04:53, 28 September 2004 view source Isomeme (talk \| contribs) 52 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:55, 28 September 2004 view source Isomeme (talk \| contribs) 52 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I wonder about the title of this article. Wouldn't it be better to call it "Temple Components," so that the leading term is the defintive "Temple" rather than the unenlightening "Parts"? --[[User:Paradoxosalpha\|Paradoxosalpha]] 11:52, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT)		I wonder about the title of this article. Wouldn't it be better to call it "Temple Components," so that the leading term is the defintive "Temple" rather than the unenlightening "Parts"? --[[User:Paradoxosalpha\|Paradoxosalpha]] 11:52, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT)

	I'd even prefer an article "Temple" with this as a subhead.		:I'd even prefer an article "Temple" with this as a subhead. --[[user:Craig Berry\|isomeme]]