Talk:The Great God Pan (book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
93 Fr. Zabed, | |||
1. It's part of the A:.A:. reading list. | |||
2. It presents a great description of Pan. | |||
3. I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much. I was just looking for some fiction to read. I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia. | |||
Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance. If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance." | |||
93,93/93 | |||
[[User:ThomasStevens|Thomas Stevens]] 16:12, 10 Jul 2005 (CDT) | |||
93. | 93. | ||
I dont want to be rude or anything like that, i can see you like this book. But how is this relevant to Thelema?:) | I dont want to be rude or anything like that, i can see you like this book. But how is this relevant to Thelema?:) | ||
93 93/93 | 93 93/93 | ||
[[User:Fr. Zabed|Fr. Zabed]] | [[User:Fr. Zabed|Fr. Zabed]] | ||
Revision as of 21:12, 10 July 2005
93 Fr. Zabed,
1. It's part of the A:.A:. reading list. 2. It presents a great description of Pan. 3. I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much. I was just looking for some fiction to read. I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia.
Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance. If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance."
93,93/93 Thomas Stevens 16:12, 10 Jul 2005 (CDT)
93. I dont want to be rude or anything like that, i can see you like this book. But how is this relevant to Thelema?:) 93 93/93 Fr. Zabed