Jump to content

Talk:The Great God Pan (book): Difference between revisions

From Thelemapedia
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
93 Fr. Zabed,
93 Fr. Zabed,
 
# It's part of the A:.A:. reading list.   
1. It's part of the A:.A:. reading list.   
# It presents a great description of Pan.
2. It presents a great description of Pan.
# I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much.  I was just looking for some fiction to read.  I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia.
3. I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much.  I was just looking for some fiction to read.  I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia.


Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance.  If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance."
Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance.  If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance."

Revision as of 21:16, 10 July 2005

93 Fr. Zabed,

  1. It's part of the A:.A:. reading list.
  2. It presents a great description of Pan.
  3. I can't say I liked the story (it's only about 30 pages) all that much. I was just looking for some fiction to read. I chose a short one from the A:.A:. reading list so that I would be able to write an article this weekend for Thelemapedia.

Let me know if you were thinking of other criteria for deciding relavance. If you give me a list, I might use it as a template for a section on "Thelemic relavance."

93,93/93 Thomas Stevens 16:12, 10 Jul 2005 (CDT)

93. I dont want to be rude or anything like that, i can see you like this book. But how is this relevant to Thelema?:) 93 93/93 Fr. Zabed