User talk:Fr. Zabed: Difference between revisions
Pruning links |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
93. Thanks for contributing so much. It's a great help. I have one suggestion...when we take articles from Wikipedia, we should try to take out a lot of the needless internal links. I know it's a pain in the ass...I do it, too (in MS Word, actually). But since this isn't an all-purpose encyclopedia, we don't need links to every possible topic. It will also avoid a ton of red links on a page, which looks bad. Eventually, we want nothing but blue! Anyway, thanks again! --[[User:Ash|Ash]] 23:45, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT) | 93. Thanks for contributing so much. It's a great help. I have one suggestion...when we take articles from Wikipedia, we should try to take out a lot of the needless internal links. I know it's a pain in the ass...I do it, too (in MS Word, actually). But since this isn't an all-purpose encyclopedia, we don't need links to every possible topic. It will also avoid a ton of red links on a page, which looks bad. Eventually, we want nothing but blue! Anyway, thanks again! --[[User:Ash|Ash]] 23:45, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT) | ||
- | |||
93. | |||
Good point bro ;) | |||
You are doing a good job yourself :) | |||
93 93/93. | |||
Z. | |||
Revision as of 04:00, 22 September 2004
93. Thanks for contributing so much. It's a great help. I have one suggestion...when we take articles from Wikipedia, we should try to take out a lot of the needless internal links. I know it's a pain in the ass...I do it, too (in MS Word, actually). But since this isn't an all-purpose encyclopedia, we don't need links to every possible topic. It will also avoid a ton of red links on a page, which looks bad. Eventually, we want nothing but blue! Anyway, thanks again! --Ash 23:45, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)
-
93.
Good point bro ;)
You are doing a good job yourself :)
93 93/93.
Z.