Talk:List of religions: Difference between revisions
Appearance
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I mean, the disclaimer at the top that the categories are only one possible system is all fine and good, but why should '''we''' use these categories in Thelemapedia, when they misclassify '''Thelema'''?--[[User:Paradoxosalpha|Paradoxosalpha]] 20:45, 21 Feb 2005 (CST) | I mean, the disclaimer at the top that the categories are only one possible system is all fine and good, but why should '''we''' use these categories in Thelemapedia, when they misclassify '''Thelema'''?--[[User:Paradoxosalpha|Paradoxosalpha]] 20:45, 21 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
:Yeah, | :Yeah, the wikipedia version is long and unwieldy...and certainly mischaracterizes Thelema. I would prefer to pare down and reorg this page substantially. [[User:Ash|Fr. Ash]] 15:52, 24 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:52, 24 February 2005
Hey! The category system in this list is a crock!
Thelema is NOT a "Left-hand Path Religion." Thelema is a Both-hand Path Religion.
"'If thine hand offend thee, cut it off!' is the scream of a weakling." --Aleister Crowley, Magick (64)
I mean, the disclaimer at the top that the categories are only one possible system is all fine and good, but why should we use these categories in Thelemapedia, when they misclassify Thelema?--Paradoxosalpha 20:45, 21 Feb 2005 (CST)
- Yeah, the wikipedia version is long and unwieldy...and certainly mischaracterizes Thelema. I would prefer to pare down and reorg this page substantially. Fr. Ash 15:52, 24 Feb 2005 (CST)